Quasi Judicial Power Fastlane

Course overview

There are increasingly more organizations making their own choices about a variety of complaints, disputes, and rights. Public and, to a greater or lesser extent, private administration cannot function without tribunals, adjudicators, disciplinary panels, ombudsmen, and a variety of appeals bodies. A non-judicial body that has the power to issue judgments is known as a quasi-judicial body. It is an organization or division of government with the authority to draw conclusions and conclusions based on evidence, much like a judge or a court of law, and whose judgments serve as the basis for official action. Therefore, these actions are conducted as a legal remedy for a situation or as a legal punishment, and they may have an effect on rights and obligations.

What advantages do quasi-judicial organizations offer?

Roles and duties of quasi-judicial officials in various workplace settings, issues encountered when carrying out quasi-judicial duties, and solutions, natural justice principles, and modern labor law. Tribunals cost less money than conventional courts. Citizens are encouraged to seek justice because tribunals are efficient and affordable. Tribunal application procedures do not need to be drawn out or difficult. These bodies move swiftly and efficiently because they are easily accessible, simple to use, and are supervised by qualified individuals. Tribunals minimize the court workload by managing numerous cases. They are effective at handling concerns and do so fast. A tribunal also consists of qualified and knowledgeable individuals who are aware of the nuances of the issue and offer the appropriate resolution.

What distinguishes statutory organizations from quasi-judicial ones?

Every statutory body has an enabling statute that explains how and why it was created, as well as the powers it is given. The scope of quasi-judicial proceedings, on the other hand, is restricted to issues that fall under the purview of the relevant administrative agency. The reduction of burden on the legal system is one of the main objectives of these organizations. Quasi-judicial entities may serve as a judge and jury in some cases, passing judgment and levying penalties. A quasi-judicial entity is anyone or anything with authority similar to that of a court.

Introduction

Welcome to the interesting world of quasi-judicial authorities and proceeding processes, where administrative agencies and tribunals have authority that is quite similar to that of ordinary courts. In this course, we’ll delve into the nuances of quasi-judicial activities and examine how they help resolve various administrative disputes in an effective and fair manner.

Administrative bodies or tribunals are granted quasi-judicial authority to resolve conflicts, reach conclusions, and issue orders in particular legal or regulatory contexts. Despite not being a member of the judiciary, these bodies are given the power to decide disputes and apply legal concepts to complicated administrative problems.

Improved competency in carrying out quasi-judicial duties is the goal of Training Bee’s Quasi-Judicial Powers and Proceeding Process training course. The participants will be able to understand more conceptually and in-depth about the quasi-judicial duties performed by the various judicial administrative bodies operating in the nation by taking this course.

We are The Training Bee, a global training and education firm providing services in many countries. We are specialized in capacity building and talent development solutions for individuals and organizations, with our highly customized programs and training sessions.

Learning Objectives

Upon completing Quasi-Judicial Powers and Proceeding Process, participants will be able to:

• To acquire the ability to develop a theoretical framework for carrying out quasi-judicial tasks in the modern socioeconomic setting.
• To discuss matters relating to quasi-judicial authorities.
• To stay informed of fresh changes in judicial interpretations and labor legislation.
• To become proficient in key areas of constitutional and administrative law.
• To learn how to guarantee fair hearings in a variety of variable and frequently unpredictable circumstances.
• To devise methodical methods for gathering, analyzing, looking into, and evaluating relevant evidence to make sure that all views are properly heard.
• To develop skills that will enable decision-actual makers to appear independent and to inspire faith in the process they are overseeing.
• Should fully understand their position and authority, including the range and limits of those things.

Our Unique Training Methodology

This interactive course comprises the following training methods:

• Journaling – This consists of setting a timer and letting your thoughts flow, unedited and unscripted recording events, ideas, and thoughts over a while, related to the topic.
• Social learning – Information and expertise exchanged amongst peers via computer-based technologies and interactive conversations including Blogging, instant messaging, and forums for debate in groups.
• Project-based learning
• Mind mapping and brainstorming – A session will be carried out between participants to uncover unique ideas, thoughts, and opinions having a quality discussion.
• Interactive sessions – The course will use informative lectures to introduce key concepts and theories related to the topic.
• Presentations – Participants will be presented with multimedia tools such as videos and graphics to enhance learning. These will be delivered engagingly and interactively.

Training Medium

This Quasi-Judicial Powers and Proceeding Process training is designed in a way that it can be delivered face-to-face and virtually.

Course Duration

This training is versatile in its delivery. The training can be delivered as a full-fledged 40-hour training program or a 15- hours crash course covering 5 hours of content each day over 3 days

Pre-course Assessment

Before you enroll in this course all we wanted to know is your exact mindset and your way of thinking.
For that, we have designed this questionnaire attached below.

• Define “quasi-judicial powers” and distinguish them from “judicial powers” and “administrative powers.”
• Describe the essential features of a quasi-judicial proceeding and how a court-like process is similar to it.
• Describe the main justifications for giving administrative bodies or tribunals quasi-judicial authority.
• Give instances of how the principles are used in quasi-judicial proceedings and explain how procedural fairness and natural justice play a part in them.
• Discuss the extent and constraints of ordinary courts’ ability to review judgments rendered by entities with quasi-judicial authority.
• The issuance of notifications, the presentation of evidence, and the making of decisions are just a few of the key phases and components of a typical quasi-judicial proceeding that you should be able to describe.

Course Modules

This Quasi-Judicial Powers and Proceeding Process cover the following topics for understanding the essentials of the Agile Workplace:

Module 1 – Principles

• A description of the quasi-judicial environment
• Steps before hearings to guarantee due process
• During the hearing, upholding the rule of law
• Presentation from the source of the decision-authority maker

Module 2 – The Decision-Making Process

• Assuring the decision-maker’s impartiality through independence from the hiring authority, objectivity, and ethics
• Prejudice that is unintentional must be addressed.
• Ethics
• Internally and externally to the decision-making process

Module 3 – Evidence

• The intent, acceptability, and importance of the evidence
• Evidence: The onus and required level of proof
• Status and admissibility of evidence
• Based on the information, making decisions both before and during the hearing
• Preparing for a hearing.

Module 4 – Managing the Dynamic of the Hearing

• A moderated panel discussion on how to handle delicate and challenging witnesses
• Working together with interpreters
• Opening the hearing and setting the mood
• Responding to unexpected situations

Module 5 – Audio Dynamics and Mock Sessions

• Methods for making judgments on paper and the internet
• Intermissions and the rule of law
• Fictitious hearings

Module 6 – Making a Decision and Recording It

• Making decisions and analyzing
• The elements of an effective decision
• Decision-Makers in the Quasi-Judicial Sector and EU Law
• The decision-making process,
• Written feedback and decision analysis

Post-course Assessment

Participants need to complete an assessment post-course completion so our mentors will get to know their understanding of the course. A mentor will also have interrogative conversations with participants and provide valuable feedback.

• Explain the differences between administrative and quasi-judicial capabilities while giving instances from the actual world for each.
• What similarities and differences exist between ordinary judicial proceedings and quasi-judicial proceedings? Describe the essential characteristics that give them a quasi-judicial feel.
• Consider both efficiency and accountability while weighing the benefits and drawbacks of giving administrative bodies or tribunal’s quasi-judicial authority.
• Discuss the significance of “procedural fairness” in maintaining individual rights in quasi-judicial processes. Give instances of how procedural fairness is actually ensured.
• Describe the procedure for judicial review of judgments rendered by organizations with quasi-judicial authority. What criteria and standards do normal courts use for review?

Lessons Learned

Keeping individual rights and administrative effectiveness in check Administrative authorities and tribunals have the authority to make decisions that resemble those of the judiciary thanks to quasi-judicial powers. To ensure fair and just outcomes, it is essential to comprehend this fine line between effectiveness and preserving individual rights.

Procedural Fairness and Natural Justice: It is essential for quasi-judicial processes to uphold the principles of procedural fairness and natural justice. A legitimate and open procedure must give parties a chance to state their case, access to information, and impartial decision-making.

Ensuring transparency and public engagement in quasi-judicial proceedings is essential for fostering public confidence in the decision-making process. Information that is accessible and open encourages accountability and upholds the authority of administrative decisions.

“Untangling Quasi-Judicial Powers: Creating Administrative Justice”